← All models

Google · apache_2_0

Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Gemma 4 26B-A4B by Google appears in 2 sources with Reasoning at 35.5. Best read for Coding, High intelligence, Low cost.

CreatorGoogle
Release date2026-04-02
Knowledge cutoffNot published
Context262K tokens
Input price$0.13/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens
Modalitytext + vision
CountryUS

Metrics

All source-backed metrics

Open in leaderboard
LLM Stats Rank23ranking · source_rank
LLM Stats Code Index (estimated from arena)37.12 scoremetric
Reasoning35.5reasoning · index_reasoning
Math32.79math · index_math
Vision20.49multimodal · index_vision
Tool calling17.75tool_calling · index_tool_calling
Long context15.83long_context · index_long_context
Finance32.3domain · index_finance
Legal32.27domain · index_legal
Healthcare30.64domain · index_healthcare
GPQA82.3 %reasoning · gpqa_score
Code Arena1,244.68 %coding · coding_arena_score
Humanity Last Exam17.2 %reasoning · hle_score
MMMLU86.3 %reasoning · mmmlu_score
MMMU-Pro73.8 %multimodal · mmmu_pro_score
Context262,144 tokenscontext · context
Speed104.32 c/sperformance · throughput
Latency2,534.25 msperformance · latency
Input price0.13 $/Mpricing · input_price
Output price0.4 $/Mpricing · output_price
Parameters25,200,000,000 paramsmodel · params
Arena Rating1,434.64metric
Arena Rank46metric
Vote Count5,776metric

Evidence

Citations and source overlap

FAQ

How should I read this profile?

Treat this as a source-backed model dossier, not an EvalKit-run verification. The public values are replicated from linked sources and kept source-scoped.

Is Gemma 4 26B-A4B verified by EvalKit?

No. EvalKit currently shows 0 verified rows until real run evidence exists.

Why can metrics disagree?

Different sources test different tasks, dates, prompts, and aggregation methods. EvalKit keeps those differences visible instead of merging them into a fake universal score.