← All models
Meituan · mit
LongCat-Flash-Chat
LongCat-Flash-Chat by Meituan appears in 2 sources with Reasoning at 23.41. Best read for Code quality, Coding, High intelligence.
CreatorMeituan
Release date2025-08-29
Knowledge cutoffNot published
Context128K tokens
Input price$0.3/M tokens
Output price$1.2/M tokens
Modalitytext
CountryCN
Metrics
All source-backed metrics
LLM Stats Rank44ranking · source_rank
Reasoning23.41reasoning · index_reasoning
Math22.7math · index_math
Coding15.74coding · index_code
Writing17.64writing · index_communication
Tool calling14.04tool_calling · index_tool_calling
Finance34.68domain · index_finance
Legal34.7domain · index_legal
Healthcare34.23domain · index_healthcare
GPQA73.23 %reasoning · gpqa_score
AIME 202561.25 %math · aime_2025_score
SWE-bench Verified60.4 %coding · swe_bench_verified_score
Code Arena1,038.95 %coding · coding_arena_score
Terminal Bench39.51 %coding · terminal_bench_score
Context128,000 tokenscontext · context
Speed137.48 c/sperformance · throughput
Latency4,900.91 msperformance · latency
Input price0.3 $/Mpricing · input_price
Output price1.2 $/Mpricing · output_price
Parameters560,000,000,000 paramsmodel · params
Arena Rating1,421.93metric
Arena Rank64metric
Vote Count11,406metric
Evidence
Citations and source overlap
FAQ
How should I read this profile?
Treat this as a source-backed model dossier, not an EvalKit-run verification. The public values are replicated from linked sources and kept source-scoped.
Is LongCat-Flash-Chat verified by EvalKit?
No. EvalKit currently shows 0 verified rows until real run evidence exists.
Why can metrics disagree?
Different sources test different tasks, dates, prompts, and aggregation methods. EvalKit keeps those differences visible instead of merging them into a fake universal score.